by Stephen Gray, Adapt Research and Consulting People living and working on complex systems, which is pretty much all of us, find ourselves baffled and inspired in equal measures by their unpredictable behavior. Complex systems, be they storm systems (environmental), the endocrine system (biological), or the dancefloor at your office Christmas party (social), can be impossible to predict, let alone control. Our theoretical and informal models to understand them are all simplifications of reality, and can be misleading when not used cautiously. As the number of factors that influence the behavior of any system increases, the more complex its ontology becomes, and the less closely our models represent reality. The further we get from simplicity, the weaker our diagnostic ability becomes, and the blunter (and potentially counterproductive) our tools for intervention. Just think Syria, or the financial crisis, or any relationship you've been in, particularly those with 'complicating factors'.
So what can systems thinking offer us in the face of complexity that other models don't? Systems thinking is more of a conceptual tool box than a model. The advantage of its concepts, when used humbly and in conjunction with other ideas and methodologies, is to better appreciate the non-linear nature of reality. This helps us think and plan more realistically, instead of assuming that change follows linear cause and effect rules.  The world is round; we should stop pretending it's flat.
Systems thinking also offers practical tools, particularly… Participatory mapping processes [which are] are by intention an inclusive process of shared knowledge creation. To align people’s thinking contrasting perspectives sometimes need to be disrupted first. This is achieved by introducing additional complexity into peoples' understanding of why things happen. It often generates disagreements, which should be expected because sometimes things don't happen in the same ways for the same reasons, or because people have adopted different narratives to render complexity comprehensible. If people are open minded and the evidence is compelling enough, participatory mapping processes expose new information that destabilizes these narratives, opening the opportunity for new and shared understandings to bed in.
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="412"]Participatory mapping with conflict-affected communities in Myanmar Participatory mapping with conflict-affected communities in Myanmar[/caption] Click here to learn more about how to conduct a participatory mapping process Creative Commons License Myanmar: Burma Democratic Concern (BDC) unequivocally denounces police brutalities cracking down on students' protests by Burma Democratic Concern is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.